An introduction to teacher inquiry for professional growth. Topics include: the relationship between teacher inquiry and classroom practice, systematic data analysis, visual representation of findings and writing for research purposes.

Prerequisites: Graduate Standing and enrollment in the Multiple or Single Subject Credential Program.

1 - 4

Units

Letter

Grading

1, 2, 3

Passtime

Graduate students only

Level Limit

Graduate school

College
Jianwen Su
2.1
31 reviews
See All
Fall 2025 . T B A
ED 1207
R
16:00 PM - 18:50 PM
Fall 2025 . Scalzo J N
ED 1217
R
16:00 PM - 18:50 PM
See All
ED 265A Su Jing Fall 2024 Total: 13
ED 265A Duque J D Fall 2024 Total: 18
See All
31
2.1
CMPSC174A . 5 Months Ago

In terms of teaching you content for industry, I feel like this course really prepared me in terms of junior level sql database knowledge. Love his enthsiam about teaching. Only thing I disliked was the project which is worth 30% of your grade was done super unprofessionally. Very unclear criteria.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
CMPSC174A . 1 Year, 11 Months Ago

Pretty good class overall. There are only 5 homework assignments and you have at least a week to do each one. Textbook + lectures explain everything you need for assignments. Exams are as easy or easier than homework. Partner project at the end of the quarter, start early if you can because it does take time. Piazza will be your best friend

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
CMPSC174A . 1 Year, 11 Months Ago

I was worried about this class based on Prof. Su's rating here on RMP but I don't know why it's so low. His class isn't the most organized or clear but him and the TAs like Momin Haider were very responsive and accessible outside of class. The exams are straightforward and so were the assignments. Decent class overall.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
CMPSC174A . 2 Years Ago

I was worried about taking this class, but I'm happy to say it's improved a lot since the last time it was taught. Homeworks were kind of difficult but they're only worth 2% each. Late days are generous. Exams were straightforward and a lot easier than the homework. Project was not too bad, but make sure to start early on it as it is a bit tedious.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
CS174A . 5 Years Ago

DO NOT TAKE! 2/5 of the material is relevant, the rest is unnecessarily complicated and not important to understanding SQL databases. HWs are difficult and each only account for 2% of your grade. Exams are not graded fairly. Project is incredibly unclear, very time consuming, and graded VERY unfairly. Lectures are boring and unnecessary.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
CS174A . 6 Years Ago

Literally no one goes to class because his lectures are so useless. The project was so vague and took weeks to complete and I ended up having 3000 lines of code that looked exactly the same. The project was due the last day of dead week so good luck studying for anything else since it takes forever. The TAs are the ones carrying this class.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
See all 31 reviews
See All
ED 265A
17 / 30 Enrolled
Foundation of Teacher Inquiry
Scalzo J N
R
16:00 PM - 18:50 PM
99.2% A
ED 265A
10 / 30 Enrolled
Foundation of Teacher Inquiry
Fried B J
R
16:00 PM - 18:50 PM
99.2% A
ED 265A
18 / 20 Enrolled
Foundation of Teacher Inquiry
Jason Duque 3.2
R
13:00 PM - 15:50 PM
99.2% A
ED 229D
6 / 10 Enrolled
Applied Systematic Instruction and Assessment
Holdren N R
F
09:00 AM - 11:50 AM
97.9% A
ED 229D
8 / 10 Enrolled
Applied Systematic Instruction and Assessment
Moran A S
F
09:00 AM - 11:50 AM
97.9% A
ED 229C
8 / 10 Enrolled
Practicum in Special Education Programs for Severely Handicapped Pupils
Moran A S
ED 253D
7 / 10 Enrolled
Seminar in Teaching and Learning
Sattin-Bajaj
T
09:00 AM - 11:50 AM
99.4% A
ED 274
7 / 25 Enrolled
Proseminar in Language, Interaction and Social Organization
Amy Kyratzis 3.1
F
13:30 PM - 15:30 PM
ED 286C
1 / 10 Enrolled
Learning Theories and Instructional Practices in STEM
Van Es E A
W
09:00 AM - 11:50 AM
100.0% A