CHATTOPADHYAY

Swati Chattopadhyay

34 reviews
Get ready to read Lecture heavy Tough grader Group projects Amazing lectures Respected Inspirational Participation matters Skip class? You won't pass. Clear grading criteria Gives good feedback Lots of homework Beware of pop quizzes
Past quarters
ARTHI 136I
0 / 30 Enrolled
The City in History
Swati Chattopadhyay 3.4
M T W R
11:00 AM - 12:20 PM
40.2% A
See All
ARTHI 5A Chattopadhyay Spring 2024 Total: 212
INT 84ZI Chattopadhyay Spring 2024 Total: 17
ARTHI 136B Chattopadhyay Winter 2024 Total: 57
INT 86EB Chattopadhyay Winter 2024 Total: 19
See All
ARTHI136B . Chattopadhyay 12 Days Ago

Swati's teaching style can be best described as firm yet open-minded. With primarily clear lectures and a lenient grading system, her course is easily accessible and engaging even to someone not in the art history scene. Participation and attendance is required to pass the course, though the online exams and in-class projects were hardly difficult.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
ARTHI5A . Chattopadhyay 25 Days Ago

Lectures were not relevant to assignments and were quite arbitrary - overall I enjoyed the class but her teaching style was really not beneficial to myself or others who were taking the class as well.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
ARTHI5A . Chattopadhyay 5 Months Ago

Professor was okay, she seemed sweet but I do think your TA makes or breaks your grade. unfortunately most of the ARTHI classes are paper heavy. overall easy ish class

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
ARTHI5A . Chattopadhyay 9 Months Ago

This professor is simply extremely boring but she is not the problem. The problem is the TAs. Most do not know what is going on and will grade like their life depends on it. They are rude and extremely unhelpful. If you need an area F please try finding another class that won't hurt your GPA.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
INT86EB . Chattopadhyay 1 Year, 10 Days Ago

Chattopadhyay may be a bit intimidating at first, but she's genuinely interested in the subject matter and student learning. The only assignment was to keep a journal of class activities and the occasional assigned reading. If you show up and do the journal, it's an easy and fairly interesting class.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
ARTHI136A . Chattopadhyay 1 Year, 6 Months Ago

This professor lacked respect and was not at all respectful. She was rude and did not treat the students well. She should not teach.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
ARTHI136I . Chattopadhyay 1 Year, 8 Months Ago

Professor is very passionate about the subject and can be intimidating at times due to the amount of knowledge she has and her expectations of students. She makes lectures engaging based on how much she knows and clearly tells you what to expect for midterms, assignments, and projects.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
ARTHI5A . Chattopadhyay 1 Year, 9 Months Ago

5 modules each worth 10%. Midterm and final online. Chill class but super uninteresting and the lectures felt 10 hours long. TA grades hard and makes you walk around the Arts Building every week writing down observations. Felt like the class was a waste of my time, did not learn much. Dissapointed in the GE classes at UCSB.

0 helpful 1 unhelpful
ARTHI5A . Chattopadhyay 2 Years Ago

There is a lot of reading and you really have to pay attention during the lectures but I found it pretty interesting. Sometimes the concepts were very abstract but the TAs and the sections really helped. Not a super hard class but you definitely just have to put in some time.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
ARTHI5A . Chattopadhyay 2 Years Ago

Tough if you have no experience in the subject. TA's grade.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
ARTHI136A . Chattopadhyay 4 Years Ago

We had short assignments that did take some thought but were pretty straightforward once you got the hang of it. The final was a bit difficult. She assigned our research paper as more like a detailed review of another paper since we didnt have as much access to sources during the remote quarter. Shell give you solid feedback if you reach out.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
ARTHI136A . Chattopadhyay 4 Years Ago

Lectures are very boring and her voice is quite dry. Weekly assignments are short, but graded harshly. The research paper was a little odd for an art history paper but graded fairly.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful