I had Prof. Blumenthal for a history methods course. It was a little unclear what we were supposed to be learning but assignments were graded fairly and consistently. Personally, I find Crusade history dull but Prof. Blumenthal's passion for the topic is refreshing. She's a pleasant person that I always enjoy seeing in class and would take again.

Blumenthal is not the best lecturer, but shes rly nice. The way she lectures for 2B is very confusing bc its not taught in chronological order like a typical history class, she goes over general concepts/empires & then you need to connect them yourself. The midterm/final aren't bad, and as long as you study the study guides well, its not too hard.

Blumenthal is sweet but not great at lecturing, she is a bit hard to follow. When given the key terms for the midterm/final I didn't recongnize many of them. The essay is pretty easy, you just pick one source to examine and tests were fine. Just use flashcards for the IDs and plan an general essay outline and you will be fine.

such a bad professor, rambles A LOT, mumbles, stutters and speaks really fast, can't understand half of what she says. I wish i never took this class. Midterms are 4 short response, 1 essay question, for second midterm it's a take home paper that's being graded tough. TA tough graders but helpful, without them i wouldn't know what what's going on

Really bad professor, she rambles/stutters and yaps too much. Feels like she won't prepare you for the midterms, 2 days in, I already wanna drop. All she do is glaze maps and really boring lecture, don't even go. Hopefully the readings will be fine... Try to not get this class pls.

She rambles A LOT in lectures. Also, I literally quoted something she said from lecture in an exam, and she circled it and put a question mark (and I assume marks points off), which is annoying. This is not the class to take for an easy A. 7 reading responses (2-500 words), in-person midterm w/ study guide, 5-pg paper, and an in-person final.