None

Rate My Professors (83)


PSYCH105 . 7 Years Ago

lecture material was actually pretty easy. The hard part of the course were the tests. Questions were sometimes a whole paragraph or two long and extremely confusing. Answer choices were really similar sometimes. Its weird because you think you studied great but the test is just not well written and will screw you over.

4 helpful 0 unhelpful
PSY105 . 7 Years Ago

She spoke really fast in class so I HAD to record her lectures and re-listen! until she sent out an email saying that we weren't allowed to? Still did anyways. Didn't do well in the class because her tests were SO CONFUSING! If you tend to overthink questions like me, you'll end up failing no matter how much you study and understand the material.

4 helpful 1 unhelpful
PSYC105 . 8 Years Ago

She is a sweet professor, but the class itself was okay. She talked a bit too fast and her midterm/final were quite confusing. It took me longer to figure out what she was asking than actually choosing an answer. I was disappointed by this class. Wouldn't recommend.

5 helpful 0 unhelpful
PSY105 . 8 Years Ago

She did not make this class easy/enjoyable. Her midterm and final were worded very poorly (confusing, options longer than the question). Talked very fast. Hard to follow. She expected us to remember things she mentioned in passing. She said she would curve the class and went back on her word when grades were due. I would not recommend taking her.

20 helpful 0 unhelpful
PSY105 . 8 Years Ago

She displayed a style of teaching did not work for me at all. She went through slides extremely fast and did not thoroughly explain concepts. The tests were worded very confusingly and the answers were worded very similar. I was really hoping this class would be beneficial towards my future, but instead this class has left me feeling unprepared.

14 helpful 0 unhelpful
PSY105 . 8 Years Ago

Zoe is incredibly knowledgable and is able to answer any question very clearly which I appreciated. She does talk the ENITRE class time, so it can be hard to stay focused. You get participation and extra credit with iClickers. Overall average of the class fall 2016 was B-. No textbook, sometimes adds extra material off-slide so go to class!

2 helpful 11 unhelpful
PSY105 . 8 Years Ago

Zoe is really sweet and did a great job for her first quarter! She is very helpful in office hours and she works hard to make lectures interesting! The class is designed around the main concepts and theories and drawing connections between them rather than memorizing. The extra credit and participation points lighten the load.

2 helpful 13 unhelpful
PSY105 . 8 Years Ago

For it being her first time teaching, I thought she did very well. She was passionate and she wanted to make sure you understood. The test weren't too bad, you had to form connections, not just remember facts. I enjoyed the class very much.

2 helpful 0 unhelpful
PSY105 . 8 Years Ago

Professor Liberman's test were some of the most confusing tests I've taken during my time as a psychology major. Her lectures were all over the place, and heavily focused on HER OWN studies. I previously took a lower div develop. psych class that was MUCH more informative than hers ever was. If you can, take this with a different professor.

10 helpful 1 unhelpful
PSY105 . 8 Years Ago

She's a very inexperienced lecturer and you can tell. Her lectures are a little choppy and sometimes she seems a little nervous, but her slides are good and she's interesting. She seems very nice, I was under-impressed by her as a lecturer, but I'd love to take a seminar class from her or work on her research.

1 helpful 4 unhelpful
PSY105 . 8 Years Ago

One of the best psy. prof's I've ever had. Very knowledgeable of what she is teaching. Makes lectures fun. Young and relatable. iclicker questions count as your participation. Doesn't require a textbook, but assigns readings online. Only has one midterm and a final and chances for extra credit. Only homework is the readings online. recommend!!

1 helpful 11 unhelpful