FENG YU

Yu Feng

43 reviews
Past quarters
CMPSC 160
0 / 100 Enrolled
Translation of Programming Languages
Yu Feng 2.7
M W
12:30 PM - 13:45 PM
70.5% A
See All
CMPSC 162 Feng Yu Winter 2026 Total: 33
CMPSC 190N Feng Yu Fall 2025 Total: 27
CMPSC 292C Feng Yu Spring 2025 Total: 18
CMPSC 162 Feng Yu Winter 2025 Total: 113
See All
CS162 . Feng Yu 29 Days Ago

Ignore any rating before 2021. Professor Feng is an amazing lecturer and easy to follow along. He constantly underscores why the content of the class is useful for industry. Some concepts are initially confusing, but he broke it down very simply in office hours. He's very patient and eager to answer any questions. Amazing professor.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
CS190N . Feng Yu 5 Months Ago

Very kind professor who is very passionate about what he is teaching (blockchain). His lecture slides are amazing and sometimes the material is difficult to understand but he will always be patient with your questions. He also is very humble and research things he is unsure of and will always try to give you the correct answer.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
CMPSC162 . Feng Yu 10 Months Ago

Final exam was very difficult. Lectures were good and the homework assignments were high quality. He has an adjusted grading scale where passing is easy but getting an A is hard.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
CMPSC162 . Feng Yu 1 Year, 1 Month Ago

The lecture is clear and easy to understand, however, the final is getting very hard, much harder than last year. (In case everyone gets an A)

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
CMPSC162 . Feng Yu 1 Year, 1 Month Ago

Yu Feng was a very reasonable, engaging professor and his lectures were super clear, so I was never confused even when it got a bit abstract. He went through the entirety of last quarter's final so that we feel prepared. CS162 is much, much easier than CS160. No complaints from me.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
CS160 . Feng Yu 2 Years Ago

grade was determined by 5 homework assignments, with the professor and TA's seemingly making it up as the quarter went on. lectures had little relation in content or difficulty to the hw, generally covered material significantly simpler than the knowledge required for the homework. assignment instructions were often vague or hard to follow.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful