Lots of reading that we were supposed to be quizzed on and we were only quizzed twice. The class was composed of a research paper, essay midterm, essay final, and 2 (supposed to be 8) quizzes. She is accommodating, responds to emails quickly, and her lectures are well structured.

Really interesting lecturer. Yes there is a lot of reading but it's interesting and she elaborates on the reading in lecture. Says she gives "pop quizzes" in order to encourage you are actually reading, but she often just hints and nudges when there will be a quiz. Midterm and final are essays, quizzes are easy if you do the reading.

Professor Digeser pulls you into the subject and really challenges you to decide for yourself what you believe. We read Polybius which was tough, but she was always open to discussing during office hours or through emails (replies promptly) anything that hadn't made sense in lecture. She cares not only about her subject but also her students.

Despite the negative reviews, Professor Digeser is an incredibly intelligent and kind professor who wants you to learn. Grading expectations are clearly laid out, and she makes her lectures incredibly engaging. People are only complaining since she requires handwritten notes (which you can take into the midterm and final)

This is just the most boring and confusing class ive ever taken. She is not good at grounding you in history. If you zone off for a second you suddenly missed 100 years of history that you cannot find anywhere cause there is like 3 words of each slide. Terribly structured lectures. Possibly needs to be completely restructured. So so confusing.

Professor Digeser's class was a mixed bag - the content was interesting but the rigid structure and heavy workload made it a slog. Luckily, unstuck ai and ChatGPT helped me stay on top of the readings and essays.