UCSBPlat.com directly in your GOLD Try it Now

Examines the topic of imperialism under the Roman Republic by examining the circumstances and motivations that encouraged Rome to become an imperial power. The justifications for Roman imperialism and some of its consequences are explored.

Prerequisites: History 2A or 4A or upper division standing

4

Units

Letter

Grading

1, 2, 3

Passtime

Upper division only

Level Limit

Letters and science

College
Elizabeth Digeser
2.8
110 reviews
See All
HIST 112A Digeser E D Fall 2024 Total: 39
HIST 112A Digeser E D Spring 2018 Total: 36
See All
110
2.8
112A . 11 Months Ago

Lots of reading that we were supposed to be quizzed on and we were only quizzed twice. The class was composed of a research paper, essay midterm, essay final, and 2 (supposed to be 8) quizzes. She is accommodating, responds to emails quickly, and her lectures are well structured.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
112A . 1 Year, 15 Days Ago

Really interesting lecturer. Yes there is a lot of reading but it's interesting and she elaborates on the reading in lecture. Says she gives "pop quizzes" in order to encourage you are actually reading, but she often just hints and nudges when there will be a quiz. Midterm and final are essays, quizzes are easy if you do the reading.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
112A . 11 Years Ago

Professor Digeser pulls you into the subject and really challenges you to decide for yourself what you believe. We read Polybius which was tough, but she was always open to discussing during office hours or through emails (replies promptly) anything that hadn't made sense in lecture. She cares not only about her subject but also her students.

1 helpful 0 unhelpful
4A . 10 Months Ago

Professor Digeser's class was a mixed bag - the content was interesting but the rigid structure and heavy workload made it a slog. Luckily, unstuck ai and ChatGPT helped me stay on top of the readings and essays.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
4A . 1 Year, 8 Months Ago

Digeser wasn't the best professor, but she was pretty iconic. Her slides were unorganized, and she makes you take notes by hand, but the content was interesting. She assigned long readings from a textbook, but I still understood the content without doing the readings. If you don't mind taking hand-written notes, then this class isn't too bad.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
4A . 1 Year, 9 Months Ago

if you dont have to take this class DO NOT take it. i respect her as she is passionate about her work but the TA's are tough graders and is so lecture heavy. i went to every single one and still didnt get atleast a B. SO much reading too, even my TA told us he had trouble keeping up. please dont take unless you actually need to.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
See all 110 reviews
HIST 99
0 / 5 Enrolled
Introduction to Research
T B A
84.6% A
HIST 100
14 / 18 Enrolled
Introduction to Latin American and Iberian Studies
Cecilia Mendez 1.9
M W
17:00 PM - 18:15 PM
15.4% A
HIST 104G
41 / 42 Enrolled
The Trial of Galileo
Brad Bouley 4.8
T R
11:00 AM - 12:15 PM
78.5% A
HIST 106R
16 / 15 Full
Undergraduate Research Seminar in History in Science, Technology, and Medicine
Brad Bouley 4.8
W
10:00 AM - 12:50 PM
63.2% A
HIST 121F
40 / 42 Enrolled
France in the Seventeenth Century
Hilary Bernstein 4.0
M W
15:30 PM - 16:45 PM
39.5% A
HIST 121D
39 / 42 Enrolled
Crime and Punishment in Early Modern Europe
Hilary Bernstein 4.0
W F
09:30 AM - 10:45 AM
34.6% A