Lots of reading that we were supposed to be quizzed on and we were only quizzed twice. The class was composed of a research paper, essay midterm, essay final, and 2 (supposed to be 8) quizzes. She is accommodating, responds to emails quickly, and her lectures are well structured.

Really interesting lecturer. Yes there is a lot of reading but it's interesting and she elaborates on the reading in lecture. Says she gives "pop quizzes" in order to encourage you are actually reading, but she often just hints and nudges when there will be a quiz. Midterm and final are essays, quizzes are easy if you do the reading.

Digeser wasn't the best professor, but she was pretty iconic. Her slides were unorganized, and she makes you take notes by hand, but the content was interesting. She assigned long readings from a textbook, but I still understood the content without doing the readings. If you don't mind taking hand-written notes, then this class isn't too bad.

if you dont have to take this class DO NOT take it. i respect her as she is passionate about her work but the TA's are tough graders and is so lecture heavy. i went to every single one and still didnt get atleast a B. SO much reading too, even my TA told us he had trouble keeping up. please dont take unless you actually need to.

Professor Digeser seems very passionate about the material she teaches. She was very well-spoken, although I felt that sometimes her lectures were a bit boring since her slides were pretty vague. To do well in this class, do the readings. Having the textbook as an extra source for your papers and discussions will help you succeed.

Not necessarily hard but very lecture-heavy. The content was interesting, but the lectures were a bit hard to follow. Her slides don't have much information so you really have to pay attention to what she's saying, which is challenging to keep up with notes while she's talking. You can do well without reading the textbook if you take good notes.

Unexpectedly a lot of work for a class that most people take as a GE. This prof makes you buy an 11-page reader for $5--seems like a waste of paper. The class is graded on participation, the final and midterm in-class essays, and a project. The TAs and professor graded the final and midterm harshly, and the lectures were boring.

Everything is on paper so you need frequent printer access and all notes must be taken on paper and turned in. Kind of have to go to lecture because you have to turn in notes each week and the slides only have some information. TA literally makes your grade it varies so much based on who you have. Lectures are boring and seem like hours long.

Her slides were so disorganized and it didn't even have any relevance to the paper which made up 35% of our grade. She pretty much only puts names of historical figures and dates, but important information is based off a script she reads out loud instead of on her slides. There is a midterm, project, and final. PLEASE DONT TAKE THIS CLASS.

This is not the best designed course (sections are awful) but lectures are well done. If you pay attention you should have a good idea of what will be on the exams but expectations are still confusing. There is a project where you have to write an essay on ChatGPT, but I expect that they'll get rid of it after receiving course feedback.

The professor is kind and is clearly very knowledgable but her class was very difficult. Lectures are boring and very hard to follow in my opinion.

I like the lectures but I like history so I can see how people taking this for a GE could be bored. She always answers questions during the lectures really thoroughly and politely without making you feel dumb. I get the handwritten notes, but her emphasis on physical copies in other areas gets annoying. Sections are fine but don't add much