Systematic investigation of topics drawn from contemporary analytic or continental philosophy.

Prerequisites: Philosophy 100B or 100D or 100E.

4

Units

Optional

Grading

1

Passtime

None

Level Limit

Letters and science

College
These majors only phil
MOKRISKI D A
David Mokriski
4.0
32 reviews
AI predicted, based on past grading trends of the course and instructor, class info, and 127 other factors
Winter 2024 . Mokriski D A
PHELP1445
M W
11:00 AM - 12:15 PM
Winter 2026 . Salmon N U
GIRV 1116
M F
14:00 PM - 15:15 PM
See All
PHIL 135 Mokriski D A Fall 2024 Total: 21
PHIL 135 Mokriski D A Winter 2024 Total: 31
See All
33
4.0
Phil1 . Mokriski D A A Month Ago

The content is so boring and I never went to class because you're just graded off of three essays. But the TA has all the power and the essays are graded harshly. I just don't think the content of the class is very relevant or useful. He's a nice guy though, very passionate and interested in the content.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
Phil1 . Mokriski D A 2 Months Ago

This class was pretty boring. I was looking forward to discussing philosophy and it was not like that. It wasn't terribky difficult but I am glad it is over. If you are looking to debate, I would take something else.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
Phil1 . Mokriski D A 3 Months Ago

This class was really easy. No midterms. The final was a paper. Only assignments you needed to do were the papers. Reading the textbook he requires is a waste of time cause he goes over it in lecture. I recommend this class for a GE. He also looks like the lead singer from Tame Impala...

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
PHIL3 . Mokriski D A 4 Months Ago

His lectures are review of the readings so not mandatory. He does a great job at explaining the outlines of his papers. Super interesting course too.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
PHIL3 . Mokriski D A 4 Months Ago

His lectures are basically the reading so not too bad. He Grades easily and grading criteria is clear.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
PHIL3 . Mokriski D A 9 Months Ago

He is a great lecturer and explains things really well. Although they're worth 90% of your grade, exams are very reasonable and very similar to the practice ones. I never read the textbook and felt like his slides pretty much taught me everything I needed to know for the final.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
See all 33 reviews
PHIL 124G
31 / 35 Closed
Philosophy and Neuroscience
Adina Roskies 1.9
T R
09:30 AM - 10:45 AM
PHIL 128
37 / 35 Closed
Feminist Philosophy
Mason E J
M W
14:00 PM - 15:15 PM
PHIL 141
35 / 35 Closed
History of Ethics
Sonny Elizondo 4.7
M W
15:30 PM - 16:45 PM
PHIL 143
106 / 120 Closed
Philosophy of Law
Greg Jarrett 4.0
T R
15:30 PM - 16:45 PM
PHIL 151
18 / 35 Closed
Pre-Socratics
Mckirahan R D
R
16:00 PM - 18:50 PM
PHIL 152
31 / 35 Closed
Plato
Voula Tsouna 3.9
T R
12:30 PM - 13:45 PM