bad lecturer
No Comments
she is one of the worst lecturers at this university. it's a shame because i can tell she knows a lot, but she is ineffective at relaying that info to the student body. prepare yourself for boredom.
Not a very interesting person. Loves to assign long readings that are never discussed in class. And loves to assign long papers.
Okay, I grant she sucked in Lawso 1 but nce you get into her upper div classes she is really cool. lectures are easily followed and exams are fair (except she still loves her in class essays). don't lose hope. trust me, i HATED her last fall.
She is kinda hard in lawso 1 with the curves but after that she is a great teacher. She is hot in a thong too!!!
I think she's a very intelligent woman, but I can understand that the way the class is structured doesn't really help some students learn. She puts a lot of emphasis on class discussion. Reading load is a bit heavy but it's interesting material if you really care to educate yourself.
Moore would make a pretty good kindergarden teacher if she didn't sleep in so much. The fact that she is the chair of the Lawso department is both a curse and a shame to all of us.
I took 2 upper division lawso classes with her. they were really easy. she's not really good about going to class, one quarter, she missed 5 classes, i'm not complaining though. no need to read in her classes, she likes to assign long papers.
real talk, the class is easy but the curve SLICES you! I took the class, hustled really hard, read and studied and got a C-, as a result, i'm taking that ish again and this time, honors section = no mandatory curve there.
She's an okay teacher but her curve kills you. The readings were interesting. I was one who did them and still received a C.
if you're thinking about being a LawSo major, take this class to help you decide if it's worth it or not. i'd say the class was relatively interesting, but, the curve will kill you. she tells you her policy on it at the beginning though, so, don't complain at the end of the quarter!
i agree with the previous comment. i never went to lecture and still got an A. i think going to lectures actually throws people off because she doesn't teach well and is very confusing. even though people seem to be so against her, it REALLY wasn't that bad.
No Comments
In response to the previous commenter, F U ... I mean, seriously, F U ... You didn't read and got an A, when all the rest of us did all the readings and got C grades while still being in the 90% range?! Go to hell you suck up.
I really don't know why everyone hates her class so much. I NEVER read and I got an A. Everyone seems to resign themsleves to the idea that this class is impossible and ends up doing poorly. She's a funny lady and her class is really not that bad.
The class is pretty interesting and she is a good professor it's just that the curve kills people but it didnt kill me so its cool.
well there is one good thing about her classes, that being that they aren't hard. But the curve she throws in makes everyone get screwed. I had a 92% in the class and got a C. How lame is that. AVOID HER LIKE THE PLAGUE
No Comments
No Comments
I got a 97% in the class and got a B. WTF?! I tried to petition for a grade change and got yelled at by the psycho ****. She teaches us to be "with the law" but when we put it into use she strikes us down with her terrible wrath. She needs to be "let go" before she ruines more lives.
The curve will kill you're grade in this class. Even if you do all the reading and attend every lecture, it's likely that you will get a C in the class. If you don't mind killing your GPA, take the class.
Her lectures are terrible. She's nothing but a stupid fat **** with a horrible curve. **** the ****. I had an 85% in class and a got a C
Revoke her tenure ... 'nuff said