kind of a weird person. i was expecting a full 10 week metaphysics class but got 8 weeks of metaphysics at which point the class devolved into a gender theory class that was completely unrelated to metaphysics. the saving grace of the class was the GOAT TA Wade Fu

His lectures are all over the place, he spends very little time on important topics and then spends too much time on other things. He's really vague on assignments, so you'll rely on your TA for most of that. He doesn't take kindly to questions and refuses to accept viewpoints other than his own. He clearly knows philosophy but sucks as a teacher.

honestly worst lecturer ever. He goes in circles even if you like the topic you can't understand anything he is saying. His voice in lecture isn't clear, and his lectures are extremely hard to follow and very frustrating. If you take this class you have to self study to pass. Extremely difficult because lectures don't help at all.

Worst lecturer Ive ever had, goes in circles all class.

The first paper I wrote for him was well thought out and really discussed the different angles of the theories studied. I got a C-, so for the second paper, I dumbed it all down and regurgitated what he said how he said it. Got an A on that one. His lectures are streams of consciousness and he just wants to hear his own opinions in your papers.

Falvey is an interesting guy. Really great in office hours, but is lectures are god awful. I'm currently a philosophy major and I absolutely despised this class. That being said the material is clear if you pay attention and focus on the handouts.

I admit, Kevin Falvey himself is not an awful professor, but the structure of his essays are what make this class so bad. In the essays, you are given five questions regarding the class material, and you basically have to regurgitate everything you were taught. No creativity, no side choosing, just passively saying exactly what Falvey said.

You never knew what you were going to get with Professor's Falvey's lectures, they ranged anywhere from invigorating and fascinating; to out right boring, tangential, overly technical and convoluted, and unclear. The readings sometimes gave insight, other times they just got in the way of the lectures. If you miss class, your grade will pay

You basically have to go to the lectures to know anything taught in this class. Lectures are very stream of consciousness but he gives out outlines of the lectures so it's easy to follow (if you don't get bored). Go to office hours, both Falvey's and your TA's, to know what they're looking for on the midterm papers (2 worth 30% each) and final.

The worst professor I've had in four years across almost all of the departments at UCSB. He lectures in a string of consciousness, unprepared, rushed style. Condescending towards students. Interrupts them before they even finish asking questions. Unwillingly to adjust his teaching for differences in level of knowledge or experience between students

I had him for Philosophy of Mind and the Philosophy of Descartes. I must say that while the former class was his specialty which made it interesting, the latter proved to me that he was a lackluster professor when lecturing on material outside his specialty. Quiet, unintelligible, and extremely disorganized, office looks like a hurricane came thru

Need to adapt to his lecture style but once you do it's a breeze. He gives out notes each class on the material, VERY helpful. He's great in office hours, clarifies the material to the T. He's old so he talks low and drones but if you just pay attention you'll be fine. Don't even bring phone/laptop to class, too tempting to get distracted.