Lectures are required to attend and she doesn't post them on Canvas; they're very content heavy and go by at a fast pace. Lots of readings and some section questions every week, as well as memorization of ~100 images each midterm and final. She is really nice and accommodating, and is very knowledgeable about the subject.

Dr. Paul is an amazing and passionate lecturer. Her classes are engaging and very interesting especially if you're an art history student. Lots of information to memorize, which could be expected for an upper-division art history course. I found the material to be captivating and enjoyable to learn.

Professor Paul is, quite frankly, an awful lecturer. Her slides are completely useless pictures and nothing she says is written down. The one time there were words, she was rude about uploading them. I did 0 readings for the class, it's almost all common sense. Her attendance is also awful, a code at the end of lecture due 5 minutes after it ends.

Would not take for a GE. Asks way too much out of students when most are just trying to cover Area F. Lectures are mandatory and terribly boring.

If you enjoy Renaissance/Baroque art, then this is a class for you, if not, find a different Art GE. 6B with Paul is a harder class than other ARTHI courses I have taken, even as an Art History major. Mandatory attendance and I felt that it was hard to know how to succeed and do well on essays and blue-book tests. If you're taking for a GE, don't.

Entertaining and passionate professor who is easily accessible, although the course is pretty much as difficult as GE's get. Mandatory attendance, 2 weekly readings, bluebook essay midterm and final with upwards of 85 paintings that need to be memorized for each exam. Getting an A is definitely feasible, but will take a good amount of work.