FAMST 46
Anna Brusutti
3.1
165 reviews

165
3.1
FAMST46 . A Month Ago

Brusutti is knowledgeable about film theory, but her lectures can be dry. Textbook is tedious, but Unstuck ai helped me ace the papers. For a GE, it's manageable if you stay engaged.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAM46 . A Month Ago

The lectures consisted of watching films for the majority of the class time. She would go overtime often by 5-15 minutes. The lecture attendance isn't taken but sections with the TA are. She doesn't care if you walk out mid lecture. If you plan to skip lectures, I advise you do attend the ones closer to midterm and finals season.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
46 . 5 Months Ago

Anna is a good and kind professor. I attended her seminar and I love her so much. I recommend all students to take her seminar. But her quiz in 46 is always out of study question.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
46 . 6 Months Ago

She's a really nice lady and she has a lot of interesting things to say but everything she says is like a riddle and it's very confusing to follow her lectures. She talks like we are already supposed to know all of this stuff but some of us are new to film. Her quizzes are filled with all this terminology and concepts she never goes over in class.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 9 Months Ago

An introduction to key concepts in film and the industry. I have a background in film so I found the textbook (PDF) readings long and unengaging. Certain concepts from the textbooks will be on exams, but they are discussed in section. If you take notes during lecture and do the readings it's fine.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 1 Year, 7 Months Ago

She isn't the most tech-savvy, and slides can be pretty disorganized/misleading, but Brusutti is such a sweet lady and to even criticize her hurts me. You can tell she's passionate about the material. Only 2 papers, short multiple choice P/NP quizzes, and a written open-note final. If you love film this works as a decent GE.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 1 Year, 8 Months Ago

You will not learn anything from Brusutti's lectures. She is so boring and genuinely the most disorganized professor I've ever had. Not worth taking if you aren't a film major. If you want to do well talk to your TA cause they're the ones grading your papers. If you're a film major this WONT prepare you for FAMST96.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAM46 . 1 Year, 9 Months Ago

The class was fine overall. Not too difficult, two papers and an online final. The paper aren't hard, just took some times.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 1 Year, 9 Months Ago

Three papers, lectures were fine but she is knowledgeable about film theory and the information she gives is very easy to digest. The films shown can be a drag but otherwise it was a fine class.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 1 Year, 9 Months Ago

The material isn't super riveting, but as a FAMST requirement, 46 is a pretty easy start. The lectures can drone on but the readings aren't necessary at all. A couple of papers that aren't terrible and the final is online. Anna is pretty engaging and very respected.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 1 Year, 9 Months Ago

Very boring lecturer and the class provided nothing but a credit. If you're a Film and Media Studies major you already know everything this class is meant to teach you. The lectures were LONG and Brusutti did nothing to make them interesting. The screenings were also awful - INSANE recency bias.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 1 Year, 10 Months Ago

Okay, brace yourself. The main problem with this class is the textbook it refers to, 'Film Art' by Bordwell and Thompson. The WHOLE syllabus is structured around this book AND THE BOOK SUCKS. You WILL lose it. Anna is clearly very passionate in her subject but yeah, no, I would never take this class again.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 2 Years Ago

This class was fairly easy, two papers, a short quiz instead of a full midterm, and a written final. It sounds like a lot of writing but the papers honestly write themselves. The lectures are very interesting, you don't really need to take notes, just listen. You also don't need to do the readings. The films shown were all fairly good and relevant.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 2 Years Ago

So many people skip class, which you could probably get away with, but I honestly think Brusutti gets a bad rap. She is disorganized with slides and whatnot, and the reading is pretty much unnecessary, but lectures are still pretty good if you're interested in film. If you are not extremely interested in film analysis don't take this as a GE

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 2 Years Ago

Prof. Brusutti was a great lecturer; at times it could get a bit dense, especially with the more technical and conceptual topics, but her lectures about the films and genres themselves were super interesting, & her choice of films for this quarter was great. Although there was a lot of work involved, if you were motivated enough it wasn't too bad.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 2 Years Ago

Brusutti clearly loves film, but her lectures are long, boring, frustrating, painful, and EXTREMELY unorganized (and the posted lecture slides offer absolutely no clarity). So much assigned reading that is unnecessary and you don't have to do get a good grade. Paper prompts were incomprehensible too. Don't take if you're not a film major.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 2 Years Ago

If you are not/do not want to be a film major, this is NOT the class for you. It's simply not worth the effort. Brusutti's lectures are painful and do not help at all when it comes to the content on the two quizzes for the course. The assigned reading is also quite a bit. I didn't do a lot of it but I'd say just go to section and you can do well!

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 2 Years Ago

Loootttts of reading. Lectures are honestly all over the place/poorly organized and the professor tends to ramble a lot.

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 2 Years Ago

Had to take as a film major but do NOT take as a GE. Lectures are really unorganized and extremely frustrating to sit through. Similarly, the paper prompts are difficult and I felt extremely unprepared. Lots of reading as well. If you're a FAMST major, FAMST96 is a million times better, you just gotta get through this first

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 2 Years Ago

Brusutti is clearly really passionate and knowledgable about film, but her lectures are so messy. She says so much without saying anything at all. Her essay prompts are long and confusing. Do NOT take this class if you are not a film major.

1 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 3 Years Ago

Lectures are okay, her presentations don't make any sense, sometimes don't relate to the reading assigned. The study guides she gives out don't help at all and she assigns a LOT of reading.

1 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 3 Years Ago

Lectures are unorganized, boring, and confusing. Essay prompts are really long and unclear. This class will make you hate film analysis.

1 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 3 Years Ago

took this in the first quarter of online and it was fine. theres a lot of assigned reading but you dont need to do most of it to get an easy A. her lectures were helpful but they dont go into detail of how to write analysis but its pretty easy to pick up. would recommend office hours. 2 papers and a short essay final. weekly quizzes are easy

0 helpful 0 unhelpful
FAMST46 . 3 Years Ago

Don't take this class as a GE. Very unorganized lectures. Would go off on tangents and you couldn't really understand what points she was making. Thankfully had a good TA that helped. Really decreased my interest in film. Most disliked class even though it isn't difficult. Very little assignments; do well on the 3 essays and weekly lecture quizzes.

2 helpful 0 unhelpful